Hmm, in retrospect I realize that this phrasing was a bit ambiguous: * A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-26 04:10]: > I’ll assume you didn’t actually mean it the way it came out; > that you were actually complaining about the tools.
To clear up any confusion, here’s how it should read: I’ll assume you didn’t actually mean it the way it came out; I think that you were actually complaining about the tools. > I agree that Module::Signature falls far short of doing an > adequate job; no argument from me about that. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
