On 16/08/06, Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 15 Aug 2006, at 22:08, Fergal Daly wrote: [snip] > Just as an aside, allowing this kind of nested structure (with nested > plans) solves many of the plan problems that have been brought up > recently. Last time I brought it up I was told YAGNI but if you want > TAP to be used for XUnit then you are going to need it, You saying Test::Class isn't an xUnit framework ;-)
Coure not! Let me rephrase. If you want TAP to be the protocol which communicates the test result to the test result analyser then a flat list of tests throws away too much information, F
