Ovid wrote: [snip] > It would be nice if I could just write 'use My::Test::More' in my test > scripts and have that provide what I need, but I'm not sure if trying to > re-export all of the test functions from Test::More (kind of like subclassing > which isn't a class) is a bright idea, but it's the cleanest I can think of. > Am I missing something really obvious here? > > Cheers, > Ovid >
I'm thinking about doing the same thing. Before Chris Dolan wrote a Testing::RequireTestLabels policy for me (thanks!), I was going to subclass Test::More and expose the usual methods and tack on my argument checking. I still may do it just to merge my Handel::Test (SQLite schema init/populate) and my use of Test::More into one interface. -=Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
