Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>> Shouldn't all tests be set to use tainting?
>> And by extension, shouldn't all modules run under -T?
>>
>> (Just curious)
> 
> That would be nice, but tainting is a pain in the ass and not something I'd 
> be willing to universally inflict on all module authors.
> 
> 

True. On the flip side, there's nothing more irritating that flipping
PerlTaintCheck On only to find out a crapload of modules don't run under
taint. And that's assuming you have control over whether the flag is set
of not. :-/

Damned if you do. Damned if you don't.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to