--- Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Initially I'm concentrating on Test::Harness itself - implementing > runtests and execute_tests as thin wrappers around TAPx::Harness et > al. That's going well but I keep glancing nervously at the pluggable
> Straps mechanism. Straps.pm has the warning: > > "THIS IS ALPHA SOFTWARE in that the interface is subject to change > in > incompatible ways. It is otherwise stable." > > It would be great if 'incompatible ways' could be interpreted as > 'replaced entirely by TAPx::Parser' but I don't know how well that > would fly :) > > What do people think? I suspect that some of the stuff in Test::Harness, such as Straps.pm and Point.pm, would go away. That's a bit of concern for me as I've no way of knowing how ubiquitous their use is. I do know that a few people are overriding straps -- 'prove' even has a switch to let you override it directly -- and that might be an issue. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
