On 15 Feb 2007, at 16:16, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Replying to myself I'd like to note that from my analysis at least the bignum test failed because of the following code in the new TAPx::Parser:<<<<<<<<< sub is_ok { my $self = shift; return if $self->is_unplanned; # <----------- # TODO directives reverse the sense of a test. return $self->has_todo ? 1 : $self->ok !~ /not/; }
That seems to have been there all the time it's been in the current subversion so I can't easily see when that changed. Ovid?
-- Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
