On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:34 AM, Smylers wrote:

Ovid writes:

Schwern ... does not object to renaming TAPx::Parser to TAP::Parser.

I would rather not have the intermediate step of TAPx::Parser -> TAP::Parser -> Test::Harness 3.0.

--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance




Reply via email to