On 7 Mar 2007, at 11:15, Ovid wrote:
This discussion of no_plan work and fixing other testing functions reminds me that creating a new testing module (TAP::Tests) would still be useful. We could incorporate our new thoughts on how to handle testing and not have to worry as much about backwards compatibility with testing modules, only with TAP itself. This would also be a nice development path for TAP 2.0.
Where does TAP::Tests fit in? D'you mean as an alternative to Test::More or whatever?
-- Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
