On 3/9/07, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9 Mar 2007, at 16:15, Eric Hacker wrote:
> I know. It probably isn't hard for a human to figure it out. A TAP
> consumer can only really make a best guess though.
It wouldn't be hard to information to the TAP to associate
diagnostics with tests but where would that information come from?
Current test scripts don't make that association.
It wouldn't come from the test script, it would be in the
Test::module. Perhaps there would be an 'info|debug|verbose' command
in addition to diag. It should still be up to the programmer to follow
best practices and use it.
Or better yet, UNIVERSAL::print and UNIVERSAL::warn
<ducks>
I think I'd better stay down for a while after that. :)
