* Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-17 01:35]: > Its really not clear what levels !?, ?, X!!X and @ would mean, > or even that they're log messages, without looking it up.
I suppose that’s true, although that situation is not really different from the bangs. * Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-17 02:05]: > It seems to all be a consequence of mapping numbers (of bangs) > to meaning, something I usually rant about avoiding. So some > way to put a string label into the protocol while being > visually distinctive seems the way to go. Agreed. I’m not married to the suggestion I made. Although I did think that !? was quite a speaking “name.” :-) Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
