* Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-09T00:41:47] > On another note, I hacked together a Pod::Coverage subclass that allows > "=for podcoverage_private foo_\w+" and "=for podcoverage_trustme bar" > in your pod. Seems sort of natural to have the pod-reading tool > reading pod and all that. Is that the sort of thing that should be a > patch to Pod::Coverage?
I need to finish/test/release my PC subclass that looks at @PKG::POD_COVERAGE_TRUSTME. I am definitely not happy with the idea of letting Pod::Coverage just look for subs declared with "sub name" as you suggest. I generate too many methods dynamically. -- rjbs
