* Joshua ben Jore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-18 02:10]: > Probably but I'd ask Avar or Yves about that and I'm sure the > method would be entirely different. The 5.10 engine is > pluggable so I'm sure it's wrappable and therefore traceable.
Cool. Because that’s a subject that the existing coverage tools don’t deal very well with – just because I used a regex once doesn’t mean I actually have any significant coverage of the “code paths” in that regex. Yet all the tools operate on this assumption so far. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
