* Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-17 05:15]: > As for the 'xt' name: it tends to sort pretty soon after 't', > as in 'these come next'. I think anything starting with 't' > would get annoying as far as tab-complete goes. Similarly, 't2' > might conflict with primitive version-control habits.
Those arguments would indicate that it should be `tt`. That’s equally short, sorts far closer to `t` than `xt`, precludes the need for tab completion, and does not get in the way of primitive version control. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
