--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ovid wrote: > > After doing a bit of thinking about this and chatting with Andy > > Armstrong about this, I've realized that much of the current > thought > > about the TAP diagnostics is wrong. We already have much of what > we > > want in the TAP line above the diagnostics so there's no need to be > > redundant. The "description:" key is gone. <snip> > However, are the recommended keys documented anywhere?
No. There's been no agreement on exactly what should be done. Similarly to TAP::Parser, rather than waiting for agreement, I'm going ahead and doing it. We seem to be very good at agreeing that something should be done without actually doing it :) See my latest email on this topic to Perl-QA for my current thoughts. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/ Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
