--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ovid wrote:
> > After doing a bit of thinking about this and chatting with Andy
> > Armstrong about this, I've realized that much of the current
> thought
> > about the TAP diagnostics is wrong.  We already have much of what
> we
> > want in the TAP line above the diagnostics so there's no need to be
> > redundant.  The "description:" key is gone.
<snip>
> However, are the recommended keys documented anywhere?

No.  There's been no agreement on exactly what should be done. 
Similarly to TAP::Parser, rather than waiting for agreement, I'm going
ahead and doing it.  We seem to be very good at agreeing that something
should be done without actually doing it :)

See my latest email on this topic to Perl-QA for my current thoughts.

Cheers,
Ovid

--
Buy the book  - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI  - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/
Tech blog     - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/

Reply via email to