On 19 Nov 2007, at 23:04, chromatic wrote:
I guess I'm not seeing why a deferred plan is better than no plan at
all. Seems to me the whole point of a plan is that you know up front
how many they're gonna be.
There's that, and there's that Ovid's tests take too long to run
when you time
all of the startup costs.
I'm having trouble convincing myself that the right solution to that
is to
wedge more stuff into TAP though.
I hope the idea of structured TAP is quite generic. It's not just
about supporting this case. Is that the proposal you're sceptical about?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
