Andy Armstrong writes: > > > > Could we not add a feature to prove and/or runtests such that, any > > > > arguments after a bare "--" will be passed on to the scripts it > > > > runs? I've often wanted this myself, and --exec seems like > > > > overkill to me. > > Agreed. I think the '--' is redundant
But is it doing harm? There are quite a few commands which use -- to mean 'end of options; what follows is data' (where "data" can (and often does mean) options to pass opaquely to another command being invoked). Smylers
