On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:09, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
(option order matters, 'fail' adds the failed tests to the run
queue, 'all' adds everything, list is de-duped so the failures
run first, saved for next time)
Why this mental overhead? Do they really have to be ordered? Is
there any way that any other order would do anything remotely
useful? Would `save,fail,all` be useful? Or `all,save,fail`?
Every order I can think of besides the one you gave is pretty
useless in an order-sensitive scheme.
Sure - in that case. But
failed,todo,all
would do something sensible and distinct from
todo,failed,all
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
