Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Andy Armstrong wrote: >> On 4 Dec 2007, at 15:22, Geoffrey Young wrote: >>> it would be nice if this were enforced on the TAP-digestion side and not >>> from the TAP-emitter side - the coupling of TAP rules within the >>> TAP-emitter is what lead to my trouble in the first place. >> >> A valid plan - at the beginning or the end - is required by Test::Harness. > > yup, I get that. but that has nothing to do with the Test::More errors > that started the thread - I ought to be able to use is() functionality > to emit into whatever stream I want and not have it complain about > missing plans, especially when Test::Harness will catch malformed TAP > and complain anyway... if I decide to send it to Test::Harness, which I > may not.
You can turn off all the ending checks with Test::Builder->no_ending(1) and the header being printed with no_header(1). That's what we came up with back then. http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2006/07/msg6212.html -- Hating the web since 1994.
