Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:26:47 +0000, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> said: > dc> Personally > dc> I'd prefer to at least have the opportunity to fix my modules before > dc> ordinary users (who never touch a dev perl) will ever see the problem. > As author you have already the option to fetch the reports from > cpantesters ...
But that requires that I go to the web site and look. I prefer to have information pushed into my mailbox instead of me having to go to a web site. > ... using MARCEL's > App::sync_cpantesters. Perhaps needs more propagation. Ooh, shiny! And I see that someone has added a note about it to the CPAN-testers wiki. > You hit the nail on the head: we need better monitoring of the test > reports. But this doesn't necessarily mean that we have the right to > send the reports to the authors. I *was* going to hack something together at least for the test reports I send which, whenever something failed on a dev version of perl would run the tests again with the most recent stable version and if they passed with the stable version only then would the failure in dev get forwarded to p5p (or more probably I'd send a daily digest to p5p). -- David Cantrell | Cake Smuggler Extraordinaire
