--- Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ovid writes: > > > Forget all the silly debates. I don't want to wait or sit around > > while we argue over this silly stuff. > > You mean you don't want flaming for the apostrofly in the subject? > OK then, I won't mention it.
Yeah, I saw that right after I sent it. I cringed, but then, I have enough typos that I am getting used to this :) > But somewhere that train of thought led me to Test::Most -- which > implies "more than 'more'", and could work if you feel like claiming > this module will meet most testing needs, or be useful in most test > programs or something? You know, I really like that name. I might just go with that. I had settled on Test::Extended because I'm trying to 'extend' what is traditionally done with test suites and maybe keep it as a permanent experimentation ground, but Test::Most sounds good. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/ Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
