Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-14 17:05]:
>> it's useful to me because I say it is. personally I don't feel
>> the need to defend something many people would like to see this
>> like we're being forced to here.
> 
> Yeah, agreed. Why is everyone so dogmatic and prescriptive? What
> happened to giving people enough rope to hang themselves if they
> really want to?

Why, feature creep of course.  I like the way Grant writes it in this talk:

http://wellington.pm.org/archive/200702/grant_mclean__xml_simple_sucks/index.html

I think that the proposed feature is possible to do without being too
complex or hard to maintain, and perhaps even a useful addition to
Test::Builder for making scripts based on it more functional.  However I
am yet to see anything other than a monkeypatch on Ovid's journal, and
an incomplete patch linked earlier on the thread.

If you think it's so useful and simple POST A PATCH.  And don't attach
the damned thing, put it inline so it can be reviewed and commented on
more easily as patches were intended to be.  Don't expect people to do
the work for you.

Sam.

Reply via email to