On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:57 AM, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMO if an NA result comes in without email contact details and without > an explanation for the NA then the result should not be aggregated > against the module.
The email contact details are there, just suppressed by the NNTP web gateway to avoid email harvesting by spambots. If you have a real NNTP client, you'll see the email. Also, see Google Groups (though you have to solve a captcha to reveal the email): http://groups.google.com/group/perl.cpan.testers/browse_thread/thread/f67ccb5a66aed2e/ffa37628e76a42e5?lnk=gst&q=NA+ExtUtils-Install#ffa37628e76a42e5 Some time ago, I believe the various smoker programs (and/or testers) opted not to cc authors on NA reports as they were frequently triggering angry email responses along the lines of "I know my module doesn't work on X platform, stop bothering me and go away!" Once again, I look forward to "CPAN Testers 2.0" when authors can set contact preferences centrally. David
