On 26 Mar 2008, at 11:13, Fergal Daly wrote:
I'm +1 on that. It's not too hard to add nested blocks to the
parser -
in fact I've already done that experimentally. I got stuck on the API
design around how we represent nested results without
overcomplicating
the existing parser interface. That would be a great thing to work
on.
If you do this, there are lots of choices. Please make sure, that it
is at least compatible with
- each block having a plan
- each block being counted as a single test in the plan of the outer
block, the reasoning being that
test_foo(bar, fuz)
can change from being something which outputs a single test result to
something which outputs a block of test results with no alterations to
the plan containing the call to test_foo(). It also seems reasonable
that the success value of a block == (success of all tests) AND
(success of block plan),
Yup, got those down already :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
