Eric Wilhelm writes: > What I wonder is how Ovid ended up with a module setting a global die > handler that wasn't under his direct control
Why would it being under his control mean he didn't want to test for it? I've been in situations before where a co-worker has inserted a die handler into a library, which then broke something which used that library. The code was completely under our control; we were able to fix it. But it'd've been good to have a test; perhaps that would've stopped the die handler being committed like that in the first place. Smylers
