On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 02:56:45PM -0400, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: > In fact, on my latest dists, I only include the MANIFEST as a couresty to > stupid software that expects it. I don't see any value in having a MANIFEST > file in the dist, let alone in my repo.
My .zshrc includes the following lines: mf() { perl -MExtUtils::Manifest=maniread -le 'print for sort keys %{maniread()}' } tg() { tcgrep -brun "$@" } mg() { tg "$@" `mf | perl -lne 'print if -T'` } This allows me to say something like $ mg -iw bodge to find all occurrences of "bodge" in the original distribution, which I have found to be quite helpful. I also keep my MANIFEST under revision control. It annoys me to do so, and I suspect that a good 5% of my checkins are along the lines of "update MANIFEST", but I don't yet trust myself not to mess things up if I don't check it in. This, of course, says more about me than it does about what should be considered best practice. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net