--- On Tue, 9/9/08, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to use Google CodeSearch, but for some reason all > my > regexes that I feed it match all the cases I want to > exclude. > > I tried variations on > > > use\s+Test::More.*no_plan\s*[')/]\s*[^;] > > but that matches pretty much every `use Test::More` line > with > `no_plan` on it ever written, regardless of what follows. > > If anyone can see something that I can’t, please tell me. lang:perl no_plan\s*=>\s*\d+
This reminds me of all of the regexes people write to match "proper" HTML: sometimes something simple is all you need :) lang:perl no_plan\s*=>\s*\d+ Schwern had the 'no_plan => 1', but I was curious about plans other than one, so I also did this: lang:perl no_plan\s*=>\s*[02-9] Quite a few people are embedding the actual plan with that. I suspect that's so they can later come back and switch "no_plan" to "tests" with minimal editing. (Or with 'Test::Most "die", no_plan => 7', you can die without having an extra failure from the plan, but I seriously doubt anyone cares about that :) Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6 -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6
