On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Golden wrote: >> The problem is that we want Sub::Uplevel to do what people expect if >> they have already taken a knife to CORE::caller for some stupid >> reason, since nothing in Perl stops them from doing so. > > Indeed, but that doesn't mean you need to wave a knife around in your tests. > It can be simulated just fine with a working caller() that increments a > variable.
That's a good point. I'll go make that change now. >> Since Schwern has declared 5.005 dead and the toolchain is moving on, >> I'll convert to "our" as well and make 5.006 a requirement. > > [Slow motion leap towards the time bomb] Noooooooooooooooo!!!!! Heh. You planted that bomb, dude. Any excuse I have to bump things to 5.006 I've been taking and saying "because Schwern says so". (CPAN::Reporter and deps are probably the exception and only because Slaven has sent me so many patches that I feel I owe it to him to support his Quixotic mission to smoke 5.005.) Certainly, I'd have a higher CPANTS score if I could start adding "use warnings" to my code. ;-) -- David
