It seems like I started too many discussions at once (again), like I
always do. Sorry for that.
Michael G Schwern schrieb:
[snip] but I'm also quite happy with encouraging the idea that
> testing *is* part of the build process.
Really no argument there.
Though I agree the lack of build_recommends is unfortunate.
Maybe I'm stupid, (happens often), but why does adding build_recommends to
META.yml break anything? It would be an optional field, that most tools will
ignore (for now) and just won't run the specific tests. On the other hand,
what good is a test if noone runs it? An who wants to be asked by
CPAN(?:PLUS)?
if it should install Test::NoWarnings or so if you just want to have the
stupid module so your script works while your boss is looking over your
shoulder.
Marc "Maluku" Lucksch
