Michael Peters <mpet...@plusthree.com> writes: > Andy Armstrong wrote: > >> How about being able to nominate a directory to receive the TAP? > > That sounds reasonable. But should anything be done for a plain file?
For a single non-archive file I like your first thought: > I'm not entirely sure what a DWIM would be in the case of a > non-archive file. Just concat the TAP streams together and drop the > YAML? That could work. The TAP streams could start with the same "t/xyz.t ..." line as prove already does. Or some other more unambiguously detectable delimiter line. I also think about whether a file named "-" could be recognized as print to STDOUT. I would like that but it would again be intermixed with prove's output. Probably it would already work good enough with the combination of prove's -q/-Q option: $ prove -Qml --archive - t/*.t | other_tap_processing_app That still raises the need that the remaining TAP output is guaranteed to be non-TAP, which brings us back to the start of the discussion. Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon <s...@renormalist.net> Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org> German Perl-Workshop <http://www.perl-workshop.de>
