* Ovid <publiustemp-perl...@yahoo.com> [2009-04-06T10:52:33]
> >
> > I thought it might be nice to give the group a description, but really just
> > diagging a description should be good enough for me. I can wait for TAP 15
> > with preludes, envelopes, and the SWAK marker.
>
> Actually, you do a get description:
>
> plan tests => 2;
> ok 1, 'some test';
> subtest "this is a description" => sub {
How did I miss that?? Thanks!
> The summary test name is whatever name you give the test and comes out in
> that trailing line. Does that cover what you're needing?
Yes, although I might still use diag. After all:
ok 1 - just did x
1..2
ok 1 - foo
ok 2 - bar
ok 2 - tested foo and bar
Is clear, but when that subtest is 1..50, it'd be more helpful when reading to
see:
ok 1 - just did x
1..50
# here begin the tests of the blort subsystem
ok 1 - foo
ok 2 - bar
...
ok 50 - metaquuxbaz
ok 2 - tested foo and bar
--
rjbs
