Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Builder 0.89_01 now with subtests

[David E. Wheeler]

On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:32 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:

   subtest {
       name 'text';
       pass;
   };

That's interesting, though I don't think its worthwhile as the name is serving a dual purpose as mentioned above. It's not just the name of the subtest but also explaining what the subtest block is doing to the person reading the

code.  It serves that purpose better at the front.

The how about:

    subtest {
        plan tests => 3,
             for   => 'my sanity';
        pass; pass; pass;
    }

Best,

David