Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:23:31PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Michael G Schwern<schw...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> This is a quick release to sync with perl so 5.10.1 can release with a
>>>> stable
>>>> version number. It does NOT include the subtest() code in 0.89_01 (don't
>>>> worry, it'll be back).
>>> The attached patch does two things:
>>>
>>> 1.) Copy and paste the skip logic from t/fork.t to
>>> t/Builder/fork_with_new_stdout.t for platforms that don't have
>>> $Config{d_fork} or pseudo-fork.
>>>
>>> 2.) Now works a bit harder to suppress (most of) the SS$_ABORT
>>> messages on VMS. Passing -Mvmsish=hushed on the command line works
>>> for one-liners, but not for separate programs. I should know why that
>>> is, but it's not coming to mind right now. In any case, there is
>>> still some chatter [1], but fixing that would mean prepending the
>>> pragma to all the .plx files.
>> Thanks. I added that as d238a5d to the stable branch.
>
> Does this mean that 0.90 isn't suitable for 5.10.1 and that I need to
> wait for a 0.91 or whatever?
We're back in the same place as before. Its just a couple of little test
fixes. You can apply them or I can make another release.
Since its easy enough to make a release now days I'll just do it. But I feel
like we're going to have this conversation again in a couple days.
Also, Craig, you now have a commit bit on the test-more repo to speed up VMS
patching. Feel free to make small fixes right in stable or master. If you're
doing anything large make a VMS branch.
--
Stabbing you in the face for your own good.
