On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:41:21AM +0100, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:24:11AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
> > Thinking about this more, what about a compile_ok()?
> compile_ok() would certainly be interesting with scripts shipped with
> a module, that usually have very little meat that needs testing (since
> most of the work is done in the modules), but that one would at least
> check that they compile.
Why not test that the script *works*, not just that it compiles?
--
David Cantrell | London Perl Mongers Deputy Chief Heretic
Irregular English:
ladies glow; gentlemen perspire; brutes, oafs and athletes sweat
