Hi, 2010/1/2 Salve J Nilsen <s...@pvv.org>
> A few comments, > Thanks. > Leo Lapworth said: > >> 2010/1/2 James E Keenan <jkeen_via_goo...@yahoo.com> >> >> 3) Phalanx >> >> Though in one sense it pains me to say it, Phalanx does not need to be a >>> major tab. It can be demoted to a link somewhere. >>> >> >> <snip history of the project> >> >> >> I have put it is as a tab on the right called 'old projects'. >> >> I removed the 'Coordination' section and also dropped the link to 'Tasks >> to >> be done'. >> I also added 'finished' to the title. >> > > Would you mind changing this to something less "final"? There are a few > marketing considerations, see: > > Old = inactive | established; # Which one? > Major tab = Decision about visibility; # What needs more visibility? > Finished = Nothing more to do; # Sure? Is visibility still useful? > I've renamed Old to Archive, but you've not actually told me what would be best for the other stuff. <snip> Hope this is useful! :) > I see your points... but I know nothing about the project/history, so can only be guided by what I'm told on this list :) If you are able please join http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/perl-org-patches and give me specific patches. Hilary is working on a set of 'introduction to testing' type content for the qa site, personally I'd suggest that has far more value to the site than spending too much time on the Phalanx section, but I do understand your points so will happily take patches. Cheers Leo
