On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:29 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > So try my patch and see if it works for you.
Of course not, because the syntax you meant was s@, not s+. But even bigger, nothing in T::H is prepared for multiple extensions. Doing your patch as a CYJ-change-it-to-S@ breaks everything because now we're passing around an array ref. But I'm working on the guts to handle it all. My concern was not about handling command line arguments, but about all the internals, and what I might break that is some sort of defined API that I don't know about. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
