On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Leon Timmermans <faw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, David Golden <xda...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Then, given one of those three ordered list of tarballs that satisfy >> all prereqs, it should be possibly to repeatably deploy an application >> with a known set of module versions, even as the "latest" on CPAN >> evolves. > > That could get a bit troublesome with the current best practice to > delete older versions of module from CPAN.
http://backpan.perl.org/ I don't remember when they started keeping the history -- I've seen stuff as far back as 1997. -- Davie
