----- Original Message ----- > From: Ricardo Signes <perl...@rjbs.manxome.org> > > * Leon Timmermans <faw...@gmail.com> [2013-07-04T14:04:21] >> By what process? Define consensus? Given Andy is the official >> maintainer and Ovid is the effective maintainer, I don't think they >> need our consensus a priori. > > 06perms.txt says: > > Test::Harness,ANDYA,m > Test::Harness,MSCHWERN,c > Test::Harness,OVID,c > > So presumably at least getting the three of them to agree on some kind of > resolution process is a start.
I'm winding up with astonishingly little bandwidth due to launching our company, so I was hoping to see a strong consensus from the users. I would also love to see examples of where the change or lack thereof is causing an issue. I am SWAMPED with so much email that receiving many opinions piecemeal makes it hard for me to follow along. Were I not so bandwidth-constrained, this would be less of an issue, but I'd like to see a good Wiki page or something with the pro/con arguments laid out. If this is too much, I should turn over maintainership to someone with more bandwidth to ensure I'm not a blocker. Cheers, Ovid -- IT consulting, training, international recruiting http://www.allaroundtheworld.fr/. Buy my book! - http://bit.ly/beginning_perl Live and work overseas - http://www.overseas-exile.com/
