On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:18:30PM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote:
> Paul,
> 
> > In accordance with the terms of my grant from TPF this is the monthly
> > report for my work on improving Devel::Cover covering August 2013.
> 
> +1, definitely.

Thanks very much.  Officially, only my grant managers need to approve
the work, but it's always nice to know that other people are finding it
useful.

> Here's what I'm curious about: I notice that you, and many other grant
> recipients (e.g. Nicholas Clark) always provide such detailed reports.
> I'm so glad, because they make for fascinating reading, but you guys
> must spend hours over the course of a grant just writing up your
> results.  Do you factor that into your grant hours?  I think you guys
> deserve to get paid for this part of the process too.  It's not just a
> matter of transparency (although that's very important, granted).  I
> always think: man, this really shows off what TPF is doing for our
> community, and why their work is so vital.  So I think that your
> detailed grant reports (and those of others, of course) are a sort of
> community outreach, on top of representing valuable work that we all
> benefit from.

You are absolutely correct that writing the reports takes a lot of work.
I don't know about any other grant recipients, but I have decided not to
charge that work to the grant.

And I also agree with your thinking regarding the reports.  The
transparency is paramount, but there are other benefits, as you note,
and I don't think I could have explained them any better.

Writing the reports can also make me revisit my thought processes and
double check what I am doing or have done.  More than once this has
caused me to go back and change some code, so there's another benefit.

> Anyways, just wanted to share how valuable I thought the time you put
> into these reports is, especially if those hours are above and beyond
> the time your grant covers (but even if they aren't).

Thanks again.  I'm always pleased just to find out people are reading
them ;-)

-- 
Paul Johnson - p...@pjcj.net
http://www.pjcj.net

Reply via email to