On 27 June 2014 11:50, Fergal Daly <ferg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 June 2014 07:18, Ricardo Signes <perl...@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: >> * David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> [2014-06-26T09:19:00] >>> I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days - >>> and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should >>> never* happen. >> >> Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. >> >> Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact >> TAP that will be printed. >> >> I always recommend Test::Tester. > > :) > >> Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and >> make >> releases. > > Thanks Ricardo and Karen. > > Chad (who is making the changes in Test::Builder) has offered to take > it over and possibly bundle it with TB which would be nice and make it > easier for people to choose it. > > I'll give him the keys to the house shortly,
Done. Thanks again, F > F > >> -- >> rjbs
