Jens Rehsack wrote:
Aloah,
beside the technical background (which was in background the entire discussion)
might need improvement or not - I will not defend my attitude against any kind
of mob.
When someone thinks there is something which might need improvement - I'm happy
at first to explain the idea behind the chosen implementation. I'm also happy
to explain the reason why I picked a particular implementation. I will accept -
of course - when requirements pop up which hadn't been realized while I made my
decisions.
And yes @ribasushi - I am offending when one continuously names my ideas/work
untenable.
Best regards
What is this in response to? A tweet? Some other ML thread? IRC convo,
public or private?
