Graham Barr [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>No as I said in other mails people will only report what is missing. *>But as soo as you let people have it, even a pre-release, they won't *>like it if you remove things. Indeed. The list does look reasonable though and if there is a 'pre-release alpha/beta' where people are told that it's primary purpose is proof of concept and fine tuning it might not be that traumatic. *>but getting the right list is harder. True, but I think getting a build going would at least begin to address the issues and problems that will arise with packaging on the multitude of platforms. I'm not suggesting we throw caution and thoughtful reflection to the wind but that moving a bit more towards the production phase may make things come together more quickly and practically. e.
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Stephen Zander
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Robin Berjon
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Stephen Zander
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Robin Berjon
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Graham Barr
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Robin Berjon
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Graham Barr
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Robin Berjon
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Graham Barr
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Andy Wardley
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Nathan Torkington
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Graham Barr
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Nathan Torkington
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Graham Barr
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Graham Barr
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list Stephen Zander
- Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list William R Ward
