On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 07:15:09PM +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > There are some other warnings running compile without -Q > e.g. the attached.
Yes, that's a known issue. GNU liviconv's test/ lists CP950, EUC-TW, ISO-IR-165, BIG5-HKSCS as four encodings containing many-to-one (irreversible) mappings. > It seems that some of these encoding are not round-trip safe. > One reason for prefering .ucm is that by declaring one of multiple > map chars a fallback one can get the "right" thing for e.g. <U00F3> > is that 2B2E or 282E ? Understood. But if '.enc' will consistently default to the larger one, it seems good enough to me, as there is no well-defined "right" behaviour as far as I know. (in this particular case, as the 2B plane is the larger half-width pinyin character, it's also arguably the right thing.) > Test case? Against the table itself, I suppose? Ok, I'll write one. /Autrijus/
msg00707/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
