On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 01:19:05AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote: > On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 01:01 , Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > You may want to grab > > > > http://www.iki.fi/jhi/Encode-for-Dan.tgz > > > > and make that 0.91 (Sadahiro's tweaks, one tweak from NI-S) > > Yikes. I just made 0.91 with Sadahiro's but without the from NI-S. But > it is only at http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/Encode-0.91.tar.gz so it's > no big deal.
So, 0.92 :-) > Is the time high that one of us upload Encode to CPAN to further avoid > race condition? If so we should decide who's going to be the > maintainer. If no one objects, I can humbly pick the burden of being > the maintainer. No objections from me. > The situation is already somewhat awkward since Autrijius have already > uploaded the submodule to CPAN. Well, the HanExtra. > Dan the Yet Another Encode Hacker > > P.S. Finland seems far tonite. it goes like this twice already. I'll > wait for a while before the net attempt. > > fetch http://www.iki.fi/jhi/Encode-for-Dan.tgz > Receiving Encode-for-Dan.tgz (774824 bytes): 27% > 212030 bytes transferred in 123.4 seconds (1.68 kBps) That's funny, since my pipe in the other direction seems if not blazingly fast, at least bearable. (...) Now tried the 0.91, coming through at 21 kB/s. > fetch: transfer timed out > fetch: Encode-for-Dan.tgz appears to be truncated: 212030/774824 bytes -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
