On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:36:33AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:58:58AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > * rename gb2312 to gb2312-raw, ksc5601 to ksc5601-raw > > -raw sounds funny, as if it were somehow "unprocessed" version. > > How about -strict? > > the -raw was my original suggestion. Anton however has a different > proposal: > > Anton> Autrijus, will you allow me to advocate > Anton> GB_2312-80 > Anton> for the 7-bit GB 2312? > Anton> li s is the name used both in the IANA registry and rfc 1345. > > I'm okay either way. But not 'strict' please; unprocessed versions > are simply what they are. > > Personally, I'd say go for '-raw'.
Fine by me, given my non-existent knowledge on the matter :-) > /Autrijus/ -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
