On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 07:07:34AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote: > I would enjoy *.ucm installed but (ports|pkg|rpm) maintainers would > think otherwise. My opinion is a little shaky but I am against it > because in a way they can act like pod for *.pm. Surely we can use it > more creatively than just a source of XS. How about ucmdoc :?
mm. In a sense, .ucm files is like .c files -- it can contain comments and even embedded documentations (CWEB, heh), but in the end of day it's the .so and manpages that should get installed, not the source itself. So even if there's a ucm2pod, it's the resulting .pod files that will be installed. > But once again package developers may not be happy about it and I > would like to be sure of the consensus. I would like to have a makemaker flag that controls the installation of ucm files. But by default they shouldn't be installed, imho. /Autrijus/
msg00991/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
