> On the other hand, it might make sense to have one flag that allows both > 0xyyFFFE and 0xyyFFFF simultaneously (for yy = (0 .. 0x10)) -- perhaps > modify the UNICODE_ALLOW_FFFF flag or simly extend it to allow both > yyFFFF and yyFFFE..
I think this is the best choice: it makes no sense to control xFFFE and xFFFF separately. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
