Aiiiya! It was the fault of my ms2ucm.pl that forgot to ignore ";Lead Byte Range" line; that line was mistakenly parsed as a part of mapping. With that fixed, the new mapping looks okay and passes all tests.Autrijus and others, On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 22:21 Asia/Tokyo, Dan Kogai wrote:[2] http://www.microsoft.com/typography/unicode/cscp.htmSo I did to 932 (JP), 936 (CN), 949 (KR), and 950 (TW). The new maps generated via http://www.microsoft.com/typography/unicode/9??.txt all seem to pass roundtrip tests in t/CJKT.t but 936 and 950 fails in t/at-cn.t and t/at-tw.t.
[3] http://www.microsoft.com/typography/unicode/932.txt
[snip]
The URI [2] also has links to other code pages so I would also like to review them and if neccessary, update them. 8 bit code pages (CP12??) seem OK but other CJK (CP9??) needs reviews.
Nevertheless, those updated mappings are still subject to reviews. Should you have any objection please say so ASAP. Otherwise I will commit the new *.ucm.
I would like you to review them at (sorry, last 't' was missing)
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/bleedperl/cp-cjkt/
You can also find my crude script that was used for conversion as
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/bleedperl/cp-cjkt/ms2ucm.pl
Xie4Xie4Ge3Zuo1 !
Dan the Encode Maintainer
