--- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:34:02AM -0700, rajarshi > das wrote: > > > Yes, the second call to NATIVE_TO_UTF is still > present > > in the modified code. Typically, one wouldnt want > to > > do a NATIVE_TO_UTF(NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv)) which is > what I > > am doing due to the second call. But does that > make a > > difference to miniperl ? > > Well, the code is linked into miniperl, so I can > only assume that it's > getting called. > > If so, does removing the second instance of > NATIVE_TO_UTF() improve things? No it doesnt. The same error messages are generated. Thanks, Rajarshi. > > Nicholas Clark > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
