On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:03:42 +0200, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Sure, we can extend the magic to ensure that the increment of a > variable that holds "\N{omega}" is "\N{alpha}\N{alpha}". But I feel > that dragons might be dormant here... If is the ranges of greak letters to be supported, the treatment of final sigma (U+03C2) which is interposed between rho (U+03C1) and sigma (U+03C2) should be considered well. For capital letters, the corresponding code point (U+03A2) is reserved (i.e. unassigned). And greek-aware people may complain that stigma (U+03D[AB]) or digamma (U+03D[CD]) isn't treated as the sixth letter following epsilon. P.S. 11 is represented by iota-alpha, not by kappa, with the greek numeral system. cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_numerals Regards, SADAHIRO Tomoyuki