On approximately 12/5/2003 7:00 AM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of Aldo Calpini:
Stephen Pick wrote:
Does typing "$win->Hook(132,\&hello)" class as an "*explicit* request"?
:)
Steve, you have good points. I agree wholeheartedly with you, so what
more can I say? go for it :-)
just a quick note: the NEM, in its present state, is not really
useable. I have different plans for the future (I already coded
something in my codebase, but as I said it's not fully functional
yet); that said, just be prepared for something completely different
once I've ironed out all the design stuff and I will disclose my
new codebase (which will probably be Win32::GUI 1.00 (at least! :-)).
if I find the time, I would like to write a (very) technical article
about all this Event Model stuff on Win32::GUI, so that you can see
where we are (supposedly) going. keep on working on the current
release (.665-Fix) for now, and we'll sort out how to re-integrate
all the good things in the upcoming 1.00.
All this sounds good. I was a little surprised your hooks are done
after regular Win32::GUI processing, but I guess they are still done
before/instead of DefWindowProc, so that makes sense to me.
Is there any reason HEM cannot be used in conjunction with the old event
model?
--
Glenn -- http://nevcal.com/
===========================
Like almost everyone, I receive a lot of spam every day, much of it
offering to help me get out of debt or get rich quick. It's ridiculous.
-- Bill Gates
And here is why it is ridiculous:
The division that includes Windows posted an operating profit of $2.26
billion on revenue of $2.81 billion.
--from Reuters via
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/031113/tech_microsoft_msn_1.html
So that's profit of over 400% of investment... with a bit more
investment in Windows technology, particularly in the area of
reliability, the profit percentage might go down, but so might the bugs
and security problems? Seems like it would be a reasonable tradeoff.
WalMart earnings are 3.4% of investment.
